a rite of passage for your work to become so liked by others that they take your ideas,
ChatGPT is not a person.
People learn from the works they see […] and that is what AI does as well.
ChatGPT is not a person.
It’s actually really easy: we can say that chatgpt, which is not a person, is also not an artist, and thus cannot make art.
The mathematical trick of putting real images into a blender and then outputting a Legally Distinct™ one does not absolve the system of its source material.
but are instead weaving it into their process to the point it is not even clear AI was used at the end.
The only examples of AI in media that I like are ones that make it painfully obvious what they’re doing.
ChatGPT is not a person.
ChatGPT is not a person.
It’s actually really easy: we can say that chatgpt, which is not a person, is also not an artist, and thus cannot make art.
The mathematical trick of putting real images into a blender and then outputting a Legally Distinct™ one does not absolve the system of its source material.
The only examples of AI in media that I like are ones that make it painfully obvious what they’re doing.