• Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    and replace it with the election being won based primarily on turnout in California

    No, it would replace it with a majority FPTP country wide system. Californians are a minority of the country. They do not get sole control, nor would they under a popular vote system.

    California was larger than their margin nationally.

    But not all of that margin comes from California, and not all of Californians vote blue.

    Where you live should have no effect on how much of a voice you have in the federal government. Everybody’s vote should be counted, and counted equally, because we’re all made equally. The current system completely fails at that.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it would replace it with a majority FPTP country wide system. Californians are a minority of the country. They do not get sole control, nor would they under a popular vote system.

      Unless this also dramatically changes voting patterns nationwaide it’s essentially the same thing. Every time in recent history the electoral college and popular vote have yielded different results, the difference was smaller than the margin in California.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        the difference was smaller than the margin in California

        That’s arbitrary. The same is probably true of Florida/Texas combined.

        The whole point is that the power of a vote is independent of location.