• Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah, what’s weird is for you to openly lie and make shit up for no reason.

      He made $320,000 over a 7 year period.

      Source.

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          So you have no sources other than what you think?

          Yeah I’m going to stick with the documents that were shown in legal proceedings, thanks.

            • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              36
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              So… again… you have no sources other than what you think? Either offer sources that back up your claims or stop making comments that are immediately proven false.

              I also did believe that they could because I misread something. That’s on me and has been edited. Next time I would also recommend trying to correct someone by acting like an adult instead of whatever this behavior is. Sorry about the mistake but you really could have addressed that with a very different attitude.

              Lastly, the actual issue is a misrepresentation on how much lost revenue Nintendo gained from this man. Piracy is a factor. It is not the driving force.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why is it weird to be mad at a multibillion dollar corporation for garnishing the wages of a disabled person’s disability benefits, simply because he was providing the means to do what you want with your device? I don’t care what the courts say. It should not be illegal to sell something that allows you to do what you want with your device. Even if that device facilitates piracy. IP isn’t real and shouldn’t exist in the first place.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I actually didn’t know they were directly selling pirated software, I thought it was only about the modding device. However, I’m glad you recognize the extremely excessive nature of the ruling. Do you happen to know why they went after a single individual instead of the whole group?

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Just to be clear, you’re ok with saddling a disabled person with $14m dollar fine to a multibillion dollar corporation, for the crime of making $300k on a device that allows you to do what you want with your device? It wasn’t specifically meant for piracy, there are several good and legitimate reasons to have full control of your device.

                • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Because he lives in the US Canada, where it’s expensive as fuck to just exist as a disabled person.

                  • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    He actually lives in Canada. Your comment still applies overall as it is not feasible to live adequately on disability here but he’s not in the US.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        IP isn’t real and shouldn’t exist in the first place.

        This. They’ve made up a dubious analogy between owning physical items and knowledge, and make the “burn the witch” act when you point out that it’s unsatisfactory to make laws, and there are plenty of people running around who haven’t ever made anything in their lives which would be impeded by IP, so they just support it.

        I know a few people who’ve made IP-worthy things, sometimes published (small-issue), the pattern is that they are against IP (while for them I’d understand having emotional reasons to support it).

      • beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        disability benefits can’t be garnished. i think it’s ok to be mad at people for spreading misinformation even if they themselves are fighting a just cause. lies like this help nobody.