• dauerstaender@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being open source mean nothing if no one else can continue development, other than that yeah pretty great

    • sucius1@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being open source means exactly that, anyone can fork it and continue development if need be. I really don’t understand what you’re trying to say

      • prenatal_confusion@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe he was talking about capacity to develop further or fix bugs. In theory a community can do that (and actually do in many instances) but sometimes development of a community fork tagnates due to the lack of resources.

        Best example to disprove this theory is … Nextcloud. Owncloud went ahead and developed a new version in go to scale more easily but next cloud is the defacto standard for most people that were using own cloud before the fork.