You could argue this is like the refs calling penalties in the last couple minutes of the game. While they still need to call something egregious, refs should step back from potentially deciding who wins. If it were not for how egregious this is, how clearly he seems guilty of so many things from so many points in time …. Should the refs, ie court, be deciding the election?
You could argue this is like the refs calling penalties in the last couple minutes of the game. While they still need to call something egregious, refs should step back from potentially deciding who wins. If it were not for how egregious this is, how clearly he seems guilty of so many things from so many points in time …. Should the refs, ie court, be deciding the election?
Just replace “the ref” with the rules. IE: Should the rules be deciding the elections?
The answer is no, my feelings should decide the election riiight!?