Semantics.
What’s the strategy in that? Claiming she was never his attorney forfeits what shreds of privilege might be left of their communications and is also one less person he can blame “advice of counsel” on.
Was mostly gone when she signed the plea deal. Crime-Fraud Exemption kicks in.
To be clear, attorney-client privilege does not exist when the client and the attorney collaborated on committing a crime.
man he’s got such a distinct firehose of words constantly incriminating himself but also trying to cover up incriminating himself. ‘I dont even know this girl, she’s a criminal that’s never worked for me, but her only crime is saying what I’ve been saying this entire time, the election was stolen and I support everything she does, amazing woman, I have nothing to do with her’
Ah, so what you’re saying is that attorney-client privilege doesn’t apply to your communications with her, since she was never your attorney, right?
When he finally ends up in prison where he belongs, he’ll claim he was never Donald Trump.
