“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      How do you plan to convince people to do that? What strategy would you employ?

      Talk is cheap. Idealogues like you are glib to demand change, but y’all never have a viable plan to get there.

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        We do have viable plans, but have to fight fucking shitlibs 24/7 that are convinced it’s their way or nothing. Your way doesn’t work

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Is your way any different though? It seems you’re just as convinced it’s your way or nothing. If the tables were turned, and a bunch of liberals were refusing to vote for a communist incumbent unless they had more neoliberal policy, would you agree that the communists should compromise?

          Everyone’s self assured of their path being the righteous one. What actually makes them different though is if you’re willing to do the same if the tables are turned. If you aren’t, then why should you expect the same of your opponent?