Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
www.bloomberg.com
  • Users of those services will be steered toward the web
  • Searches indicate apps from Meta may also be unavailable

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/4kfYI

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    10 months ago

    In 911 centers does anyone use a headset for answering calls or are all calls only on loud speakers?

    AR/VR could work the same. You have your private view screen just like you have your headset. When you press a button, your view becomes public on a large standard display that anyone can see just like when you press a button to switch from headset to loud speaker.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      41·
      10 months ago

      a little of both. they wear headsets and have little local speakers per station. in a room you can get a pretty good idea of what each station is doin if youre within range

      but this all just sounds like extra, more expensive steps to whats currently happening. this is a product begging for a problem to solve… and remember, existing solutions are continually cheaper and easier to implement.

      also, no op is going to want to wear some giant head thing for a 12 hour shift. reminds me of when they pushed touchscreens like it was the end-all be-all of compute (even in 911!) turns out no one wants to keep raising their hand constantly for 12 hours.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldEnglish
        32·
        10 months ago

        also, no op is going to want to wear some giant head thing for a 12 hour shift.

        Who would want to wear a headset for 12 hour shift? I get irritated after an hour of wearing headphones.

        I got my kids some Quest 2’s last year and it’s amazing. So I can see in 10 years it might be good for productivity. Dismissing it because it isn’t useful for 911 call centers is kind of ridiculous.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          43·
          10 months ago

          my only point is that it will be a toy, or for niche applications. this isnt going to be a an ipad-level device.

          i think you can find a direct parallel in the amount of touch screen desktop interfaces today.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldEnglish
            31·
            10 months ago

            But it’s a replacement/supplement for a monitor in the same way an iPhone is a replacement for an old style cell phone. The iPad is an extremely niche solution but there are still enough niches for it to sell well.

            Smartphones had many drawbacks compared to old phones too. The only huge problem with the Apple AR is the price.

          • Skates@feddit.nlEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            my only point is that it will be a toy, or for niche applications.

            Your only point is the same point people with no idea of how things work have been making since forever. “It’s just a fad”. This was claimed about cars, about the internet, about computers, about videogames… Literally anyone who’s out of touch with reality and resents their lack of creativity or ability to think of a use for a groundbreaking technology positions themselves this way. It’s not new, and maybe it’s sometimes worth debating, but not when you follow it up with something like this:

            this isnt going to be a an ipad-level device.

            The iPad? Really? That’s your idea of a gamechanger? If you think ipads are anything except “a toy” and “for niche applications”, you’re living your wildest years, my dude.