Summary

Russia was excluded from Trump’s sweeping tariff list due to existing U.S. sanctions that limit trade, White House officials claimed.

Despite lower trade volumes, countries like Syria were still included, prompting skepticism.

Trump has prioritized ending the war in Ukraine and threatened 50% tariffs on nations buying Russian oil. Russian state media framed the omission as sanctions-based, not favoritism, with some mocking Trump’s harsher stance on allies.

Ukraine, meanwhile, faces a 10% tariff despite the country’s strategic partnership with the U.S.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Right, because even though we both know you were wrong, you’re too fragile to admit it.

        • hansolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not fragile. I really do recall seeing an article about this, and digging into finding it to show that I was only wrong admit the citation and not the content of the comment and my heart. But thats a chore and I’m putting off spending time doing that.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Trust me bro, I was right, I just don’t feel like proving it.

            Fragile little ego. So pathetic.

            • hansolo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Turns out it was an NY Times article, which you are free to search for yourself because this thirsty for attention wannabe troll shit can fuck right off.

              Fun fact: Being abrasive and needing someone else to spoon-feed you the exact baby food you want isn’t a great way to go through life.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Turns out it was an NY Times article

                No it wasn’t, you’re lying again.

                needing someone else to spoon-feed you the exact baby food you want isn’t a great way to go through life

                Asking people for sources for their outlandish claims is “being spoonfed baby food” now.

                Jesus, you’ll really do anything but just admit to being wrong. It’s so cringe.

                Look, you came into this thread trying to dunk on people, got proven wrong, pivoted and doubled down, got proven wrong again and you just can’t seem to handle that fact. We both know it. Just admit it and take the L.