Assuming disabled people must have voted for Trump and therefore get what they deserve is disingenuous.
This isn’t at all what I said. I said specifically you can’t vote for the “throw all disabled people in a volcano” party and then be surprised when they start throwing disabled people in volcanos…
I’m a person with disabilities, which is precisely why I didn’t vote for the “throw all disabled people in a volcano” party… It’s not wrong to hold people accountable for how they vote, even if they’re disabled. That’s not saying “haha, you deserve this!” but rather its “Welcome to adulthood. Decisions have consequences.”
This isn’t at all what I said. I said specifically you can’t vote for the “throw all disabled people in a volcano” party and then be surprised when they start throwing disabled people in volcanos…
I’m a person with disabilities, which is precisely why I didn’t vote for the “throw all disabled people in a volcano” party… It’s not wrong to hold people accountable for how they vote, even if they’re disabled. That’s not saying “haha, you deserve this!” but rather its “Welcome to adulthood. Decisions have consequences.”
Again, there’s no evidence from the article that the disabled people in question voted in ANY WAY, much less that they voted for Trump.
That’s why your assumption they did is disingenuous.
If the article were about disabled Trump voters, then you’d have a point. It’s not.