The main thrust of the argument seems to be two fold - it‘s not 100% is (almost nothing is) and it costs a lot upfront (so do fossil-fuel plants). Smells like like some serious astroturfing to me

The rest of your argument? The only thing I see missing is transport. It needs to scale to global levels and be free with respect to both carbon and cash

I would recommend reading Kim Stanley Robinson for better ideas than I could ever give - The Ministry for the Future and New York 2140 spring to mind.

And all the Megachurch (MAGA-Church?) priests…?

That’s a Howler Monkey! Possibly getting a blow job from Rudy Giuliani

Yes, he may be a heinous criminal, and a traitor to his country, but why is he doing “duck face” in pretty much every picture he’s not speaking in? In those, he looks like a Howler Monkey.

Isn’t this guy supposed to be a lawyer? He can’t string two sentences together coherently.

How is this f*cktard speaking on behalf of anyone…?

The “AI” can safely be omitted from the title. That’s the nature of all startups…