Tens of thousands of Georgians have taken to the streets of the capital Tbilisi on Saturday evening to protest a controversial “foreign influence” bill backed by the government.
Protesters marched to the capital’s Europe Square holding Georgian and EU flags, chanting “no to the Russian law”.
The law would target civil society organisations and independent media that receive foreign funding.
Massive rallies have gripped the Black Sea Caucasus country for nearly a month after the ruling Georgian Dream party reintroduced the bill.
Despite a campaign of intimidation ahead of Saturday’s rally - in which dozens of NGO workers, activists and opposition politicians received threats or were physically assaulted - protesters turned up in their thousands undeterred by the pouring rain.
Opposition parties say the bill - coined “Russian law” after Russia’s passing of similar legislation in 2012 - will be used by the government to clamp down on dissent.
The US has said the bill threatens free speech.
In neighbouring Russia, the law has since been used to marginalise voices challenging the Kremlin - including prominent cultural figures, media organisations and civil society groups.
Many Georgians in the rally do not want Russia’s authoritarian-style leadership crossing into their country.
“We don’t need to return to the Soviet Union,” 38-year-old Georgian-language teacher Lela Tsiklauri, said.
“We are protecting our European future and our freedom,” said another protester, Mariam Meunrgia, 39, who works for a German company.
The law, if passed, could harm Georgia’s attempt to join the EU, which has given it candidate status.
On Friday, foreign ministers of Nordic and Baltic states issued a joint statement urging the government in Tbilisi to reconsider the bill
Last week, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the Georgian people want a “European future”.
“Georgia is at a crossroads. It should stay the course on the road to Europe,” she posted on X.
But the Georgian Dream government has defended the bill, saying it will “boost transparency” over NGOs’ foreign funding. It aims to sign the measure into law by mid-May.
If adopted, the law would require that any independent NGO and media organisation receiving more than 20% of its funding from abroad to register as an “organisation pursuing the interests of a foreign power”.
But the protesters fear it could be used to crush critical voices ahead of parliamentary elections later this year.
The bill cleared its second parliamentary stage by a margin of 83 votes to 23. After a third reading, it has to be signed by President Salome Zurabishvili, who has vowed to veto it - although Georgian Dream has sufficient numbers in parliament to overrule her.
In 2023, mass street protests forced Georgian Dream to drop plans for similar measures.
What confuses me: Why would the “Russian law” not cover Russian funding of media influence?
It’s called Russian law because it is from Russia (both content and the directive)
It’s called Russian law because it is from Russia (both content and the directive)
But Russian influence would be banned, too, no?
Russian money is funneled differently, mostly directly through politicians or satellite businesses, not through ngo’s. And that money is for different purposes, it’s not aid for cultural exchange or human rights or marginalized groups or independent media organizations so the system does not apply. This bill is specifically to harass ngo’s and independent or opposition media. Even the host on main propaganda channel slipped up and straight up admitted that it’s to protect from “foreign influence” other than Russia.
Another important point for context is that majority (if not all) of independent observers on elections are (obviously) members of ngo’s. Georgian Dream must fear that their usual election fraud of 5-7% along with their abuse systems for forcing govmt employees’ and parole citizens’ votes (also somewhere in that range) is no longer enough to get the majority, and to commit even larger fraud, they need to have a reason for disqualifying all the independent observers.
I see. Thanks.
If we are to learn from experience, Russia should start invading Georgia days after the end of the Paris Olympics. Mark my word
If we are to learn from experience, Russia should start invading Georgia days after the end of the Paris Olympics. Mark my word
Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 and since then occupies parts of Georgia. You’re a bit late with your prediction.
And the international community didn’t mind when it happened.
I’m still baffled by the fact Putin chose to gamble on Ukraine of all countries. If he had kept occupying small pieces and expanding they could have held by now significant portions of not only Ukraine but Georgia, Moldova, maybe even Finland. And the EU would still be dragging their feet if it were done well.
